World Water Levels

low for the date

Müritz-Elde Waterway at Parchim Güte

The Müritz-Elde Waterway at Parchim Güte read 93 cm at .

Newest reading
93 cmProvisional
Against normal for the date
lowin the lowest 10 percent for the date
Normal range for the date
93 cm to 102 cmMedian 98 cm
Change
  • +2 cm in a day
  • -2 cm in a week

That is below the normal range for the date, in the lowest 10 percent of the daily averages of these dates in the 19 years between 2006 and 2025.

We show no forecast values for German gauges: the forecasts PEGELONLINE relays come from the Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG), whose terms allow only private and own use. ELWIS and the BfG publish them. ELWIS BfG 6-week forecast

Long views: the past year, the past decade and the whole record

Normal range and official levels

The normal range for 5 October is 93 cm to 102 cm: the 10th to 90th percentile of the daily averages from 28 September to 12 October in 19 years between 2006 and 2025.

Records

  • Highest reading in our series since 12 October 2006: 121 cm at 11:30 CET on 22 December 2023. Provisional data.
  • Lowest reading in our series since 12 October 2006: 35 cm at 14:45 CEST on 12 October 2006. Provisional data.
  • Highest daily average in our series since 12 October 2006: 110.7 cm on 22 January 2008. Provisional data.
  • Lowest daily average in our series since 12 October 2006: 35 cm on 12 October 2006. Provisional data.

Next gauges on this water

The next gauges on this water by river kilometre.

About this gauge

Parchim Güte is a gauge on the Müritz-Elde Waterway in Germany, at river kilometre 72.567.

It lies at 53.4253° N, 11.8346° E.

Its readings come from the Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration (WSV), through PEGELONLINE.

The gauge reads the height of the water above a fixed zero, not the depth of the river. Its zero lies at 42.807 m above NHN (the German sea-level datum), valid from 1 November 2019.

PEGELONLINE publishes its readings as unchecked raw data.

The newest reading is provisional: the source may still correct it.

See also