World Water Levels

low for the date

Weser at Grosse Weserbrücke

The Weser at Grosse Weserbrücke read 466 cm at .

Newest reading
466 cmProvisional
Against normal for the date
lowin the lowest 5 percent for the date
Normal range for the date
521 cm to 589 cmMedian 550 cm
Change
  • +78 cm in a day
  • -113 cm in a week

That is below the normal range for the date, in the lowest 5 percent of the daily averages of these dates in the 26 years between 2000 and 2025.

We show no forecast values for German gauges: the forecasts PEGELONLINE relays come from the Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG), whose terms allow only private and own use. ELWIS and the BfG publish them. ELWIS BfG 6-week forecast

Long views: the past year, the past decade and the whole record

Normal range and official levels

The normal range for 5 October is 521 cm to 589 cm: the 10th to 90th percentile of the daily averages from 28 September to 12 October in 26 years between 2000 and 2025.

Records

  • Highest reading in our series since 1 January 2000: 1,025 cm at 05:45 CET on 6 December 2013. Provisional data.
  • Lowest reading in our series since 1 January 2000: 201 cm at 13:59 CEST on 20 October 2023. Provisional data.
  • Highest daily average in our series since 1 January 2000: 799 cm on 6 December 2013. Provisional data.
  • Lowest daily average in our series since 1 January 2000: 394.2 cm on 1 March 2018. Provisional data.

As the source publishes them

Next gauges on this water

The next gauges on this water by river kilometre.

About this gauge

Grosse Weserbrücke is a gauge on the Weser in Germany, at river kilometre 0.04.

It lies at 53.0731° N, 8.8036° E.

Its readings come from the Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration (WSV), through PEGELONLINE.

The gauge reads the height of the water above a fixed zero, not the depth of the river. Its zero lies at -5.02 m above NHN (the German sea-level datum), valid from 1 November 2019.

PEGELONLINE publishes its readings as unchecked raw data.

The newest reading is provisional: the source may still correct it.

See also