low for the date
Mittelland Canal at Sülfeld OW
The Mittelland Canal at Sülfeld OW read 65.05 m above NN at .
- Newest reading
- 65.05 mProvisional
- Against normal for the date
- lowin the lowest 10 percent for the date
- Normal range for the date
- 65.06 m to 65.13 mMedian 65.09 m
- Change
- -0.05 m in a day
- -0.07 m in a week
That is below the normal range for the date, in the lowest 10 percent of the daily averages of these dates in the 12 years between 2011 and 2025.
We show no forecast values for German gauges: the forecasts PEGELONLINE relays come from the Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG), whose terms allow only private and own use. ELWIS and the BfG publish them. ELWIS BfG 6-week forecast
Long views: the past year, the past decade and the whole record
Normal range and official levels
The normal range for 5 October is 65.06 m to 65.13 m: the 10th to 90th percentile of the daily averages from 28 September to 12 October in 12 years between 2011 and 2025.
Records
- Highest reading in our series since 6 September 2011: 65.42 m at 10:15 CEST on 2 July 2013. Provisional data.
- Lowest reading in our series since 6 September 2011: 64.40 m at 11:00 CET on 17 January 2014. Provisional data.
- Highest daily average in our series since 6 September 2011: 65.336 m on 1 July 2013. Provisional data.
- Lowest daily average in our series since 6 September 2011: 64.671 m on 29 March 2021. Provisional data.
Next gauges on this water
The next gauges on this water by river kilometre.
- Mehrum, km 192.556: 65.09 m
- Thune, km 222.85: 65.08 m
- Mittelland Canal at Sülfeld OW
- Sülfeld UW, km 238: 56.00 m
- Vorsfelde, km 249.12: 56.04 m
About this gauge
Sülfeld OW is a gauge on the Mittelland Canal in Germany, at river kilometre 235.7.
It lies at 52.4168° N, 10.6474° E.
Its readings come from the Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration (WSV), through PEGELONLINE.
Heights are given above NN, the datum the source names (NN).
PEGELONLINE publishes its readings as unchecked raw data.
The newest reading is provisional: the source may still correct it.